Grammer v. Endicott Clay Products
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.
In this workers’ compensation case, the plaintiff-appellant employee, Terry Grammer, sought a waiting-time penalty from the defendants-appellees, the employer, Endicott Clay Products, and its insurer, Columbia Insurance Group. The Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court denied such penalty; the Nebraska Court of Appeals thereafter reversed the compensation court’s decision. See Grammer v. Endicott Clay Products, 96 NCA No. 44, case No. A-96-161 (not designated for permanent publication). Endicott and Columbia successfully sought further review by this court; we now affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mendoza v. Omaha Meat ProcessorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Guardianship of BloomquistNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Holton v. F.H. Stoltze Land & Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
- Duggan v. BeermannNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Winn v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Farmers Union Cooperative Insurance v. Allied Property & Casualty InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- US West Communications, Inc. v. TaborskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Parnell v. Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Roth v. Sarpy County Highway DepartmentNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Lagemann v. Nebraska Methodist Hosp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.