Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Missoula v. Mix

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1950No. 8921Published

1Dissent

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE ADAIR:

I dissent.

First. The evidence in this record is wholly insufficient to show title in either plaintiff or defendant to any property claimed by either in this suit.

The only evidence in the record is that introduced by the plaintiff city. It consists of: (1) The warranty deed from defendant to McKenzie; (2) the quit claim deed from McKenzie to the city; (3) an unauthenticated contour map; and (4) five pages of testimony elicited from two witnesses.

The defendant introduced no evidence whatever, but rested his case on the interpretation to be accorded the “reservation”…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hammell v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Stewart v. Phoenix National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  3. City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Ballard v. TitusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Smith v. WhitneyMontana Supreme Court · 1937

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API