Legal Opinion

Wilson v. City of South Euclid

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 13, 2023No. 1:22-cv-01861Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION TENISHA R. WILSON, et al., ) CASE NO. 1:22-cv-01861 ) Plaintiffs, ) JUDGE CHARLES E. FLEMING ) v. ) ) CITY OF SOUTH EUCLID, ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND Defendant. ) ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Defendant City of South Euclid’s (the “City”), Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 6). Plaintiffs Tenisha Wilson and Denman Gordon timely opposed the City’s Motion. (ECF No. 7). The City subsequently filed a Reply Brief. (ECF No. 8). For the foregoing reasons, the City’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND A. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kuhnle Brothers, Inc. v. County of GeaugaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. Dixon v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  5. Stanley Trzebuckowski Lecue, Inc. v. City of Cleveland Lauren C. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API