Legal Opinion

Woodroffe v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 26, 2008No. A135825Published

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Petitioner petitioned for judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision. The board moved to dismiss the petition, asserting that this court lacks jurisdiction because petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. For the reasons discussed below, we dismiss the petition for judicial review because we lack jurisdiction.

The material facts are procedural and not disputed. In 1995, petitioner was convicted of multiple felonies and was sentenced, as a dangerous offender, to an indeterminate sentence not to exceed 30 years. At the time the instant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Wilkinson v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API