Legal Opinion

Rivas v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 8, 2015No. A154737PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.

Petitioner, a prisoner at Oregon State Correctional Institution, challenges as unconstitutional “Exhibit NOR-1,”1 which is a notice of rights form that is part of the packet that the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision provides to prisoners before conducting a parole-exit interview, as well as OAR 255-030-0013(1), which requires the board to provide Exhibit NOR-1 to prisoners. OAR 255-030-0013(1) (“The inmate shall receive a copy of the Board Review Packet, including the notice of rights (Exhibit NOR-1), at least 14 days prior to the [prison-term] hearing.”); OAR 255-060-0006(2) (“The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Wilkinson v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Wolf v. Oregon Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Ramirez v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Schroeder v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API