Legal Opinion
Smith v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 8, 2017No. A153132PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, P. J.
Petitioner seeks review of a final order by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) denying him parole and deferring his parole eligibility date for five years. We affirm.
In 1981, petitioner was convicted of four counts of first-degree burglary and one count of second-degree burglary. Petitioner entered the Oregon State Penitentiary and was released on parole in 1984. Eight days after being paroled, petitioner committed new crimes. As a result of those new crimes, petitioner was sentenced to multiple, consecutive terms of incarceration and was found to be a dangerous offender.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Climax Molybdenum Co. v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Weidner v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Reguero v. Teacher Standards & Practices CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Supension of Driving Privileges of Cole v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services BranchOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Ramirez v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mendacino v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017