Legal Opinion

Birt v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 20, 1967No. 203-66PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, Judge

Plaintiff is a former Marine Corps master sergeant who was discharged from that service on July 28, 1961, under *912honorable conditions for the convenience of the Government. This administrative action was undertaken pursuant to regulations set forth in the Marine Corps Personnel Manual.1 In this suit, plaintiff attacks the legality of his discharge, alleging it to have been the product of arbitrary and capricious action; relief in the form of back pay is the restitution sought. We find the claim to be without merit.

It is argued that the present case mirrors the issues presented in Sofranoff v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harmon v. BruckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Fannie Mae Clackum v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  3. Murray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  4. Sofranoff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  5. Rowe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  2. Casey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  3. Keef v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  4. Philip L. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. May v. GrayDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API