Philip L. Anderson v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Military Pay; Nonjusticiable Challenge to Merits of Allegedly Wrongful Discharges; No Violation of Statute, Regulation or Procedure; Rights to Due Process and Equal Protection Under the Fifth Amendment Not Violated.
OPINION
Bush, Judge.
This military pay ease is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss, or, in the alternative, motion for judgment upon the administrative record, filed under Rules 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6) and 52.1 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). Defendant’s motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for decision. Although plaintiffs requested…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Richard P. Watson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Sharpe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Stein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Strand v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.