Legal Opinion

Heshion v. Julian

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 9644PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Hendricks Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

This was a suit by the appellees against the appellant, upon an open account for legal services rendered by them for the appellant, as his attorneys. The cause was put at issue and tried by a jury, and a verdict was returned for the appellees, and judgment was rendered accordingly.

In this court, the appellant has assigned the following errors:

1. Appellees’ complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

2. The circuit court erred in sustaining the appellees’ demurrer to the fourth paragraph of the appellant’s answer.

In their complaint, the appellees alleged in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Macy v. CombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Higert v. Trustees of Indiana Asbury UniversityIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Mayes v. GoldsmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Emmons v. NewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ketcham v. BarbourIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Breinig v. SparrowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Terrell v. ButterfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Jaqua v. Cordesman & Egan Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louise Railway Co. v. ThornburghIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API