Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louise Railway Co. v. Thornburgh

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1884No. 11,090PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

Complaint in two paragraphs by the appellee to recover for the use and occupation of real estate. Appellant answered by the general denial, the statute of limitations and payment. To the special paragraphs of answerappellee replied in denial. The issues were tried by a jury and a verdict returned for the appellee, upon which judgment was rendered over the appellant’s motion for a new trial.

It is insisted that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This objection is presented for the first time in this court, there having been no demurrer to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Central Mills Co. v. HartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  2. Charlestown School Township v. HayIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Parker v. ClaytonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Mayes v. GoldsmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Newby v. VestalIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dill v. FrazeIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Hopkins v. RatliffIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Cambridge Lodge, No. 9, Knights of Pythias v. RouthIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Jaqua v. Cordesman & Egan Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Schwartzman v. Wilmington Stores Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API