Wolfe v. Harms
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Commissioner.
Action for damages for personal injuries in which verdict and judgment were for plaintiffs, Almeda Wolfe and Earl Wolfe, for $75,000 and $13,500, respectively, against all defendants. Defendants Mehls and Southwest Freight Lines, Inc., were denied a new trial; defendants Harms and Kast were awarded a new trial on liability only, and the verdict in favor of plaintiffs against Mehls and Southwest was ordered held in abeyance pending the retrial of liability of Harms and Kast. All defendants have appealed.
On September 25, 1965, Earl Wolfe and his wife, Almeda, lived on the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Vietmeier v. VossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Yeaman v. StormsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Hoelzel v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Corp. v. Joplin Cement CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Bartleman v. HumphreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Rinker v. Ford Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Vaeth Ex Rel. Vaeth v. GeggSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- Cook v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- Shelton v. BrunerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.