Smith v. McDowell Furniture Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
It was admitted that the present action is between the ■same parties and for the same cause as that alleged in the former action which was terminated by judgment of nonsuit, affirmed on appeal. But it was contended that new and additional evidence had been offered in the present action which had not been offered in the former action, particularly as tending to repel the inference of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff, and that this action was not being prosecuted upon substantially the same evidence as that appearing of record in the previous action. Hampton v. Spinning Co.,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Town of Burnsville v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Fox v. Cramerton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Hampton v. . Spinning CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Craver v. . SpaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Charles S. Hunt v. Howard H. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- State v. RaynorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Poindexter v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF WINSTON SALEMSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958