Madsen v. Anderson
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Justice:
This is an appeal from a judgment enforcing a forfeiture clause in a Utah uniform real estate contract. The trial court ruled that the forfeiture clause was triggered by the buyers’ failure to reimburse the sellers for their payment of property taxes on the subject real estate. We reverse.
In 1975 defendants Christian and Linda Anderson (the buyers) executed a uniform real estate contract for the purchase of a home and lot in Alpine, Utah, from plaintiffs Dale and Bobby Madsen (the sellers). At the time, the buyers were living out of state and were hoping for a job transfer to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Perkins v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- Zion's Properties, Inc. v. HoltUtah Supreme Court · 1975
- Robbins v. FinlayUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Grow v. Marwick Development, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
- Johnson v. CarmanUtah Supreme Court · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commercial Real Estate Investment, L.C. v. Comcast of Utah II, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
- Young Electric Sign Co. v. United Standard West, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- Reliance Insurance Co. v. Utah Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Adair v. BrackenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
- Commercial Investment Corp. v. SiggardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.