Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Carman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1977No. 14807PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Defendant-appellant, a seller of real property to plaintiff-respondent under a uniform real estate sales contract, appeals from a decision of the Fourth Judicial District Court of Duchesne County. The lower court granted respondent-buyer damages of $8,845.00 in an action by respondent to recover part of the money paid under the contract. The court held that to enforce the forfeiture provision of the sales contract was unconscionable. Affirmed. Costs to respondent.

Appellant (hereafter referred to as seller) and respondent (hereafter buyer) entered into a uniform real estate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Perkins v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Jacobson v. SwanUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Carlson v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Peck v. JuddUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Kay v. WoodUtah Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re BoothUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1982
  3. Bekins Bar v. Ranch v. HuthUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Bean v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Commercial Real Estate Investment, L.C. v. Comcast of Utah II, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API