Legal Opinion

Adair v. Bracken

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 24, 1987No. 860116-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Judge:

Appellants Gerry Leon Adair and Jane E. Adair seek reversal of a district court judgment that denied their request for specific performance and enforced the forfeiture clause of a uniform real estate contract in favor of respondents. They present two questions on appeal: (1) Was the finding that appellants intentionally abandoned their rights under the contract clearly erroneous? (2) Was the notice given by respondents insufficient as a matter of law to terminate appellants’ rights under the contract? Because we answer both of these questions in the affirmative, we reverse the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Butler v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Grow v. Marwick Development, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Timpanogos Highlands, Inc. v. HarperUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Leone v. ZunigaUtah Supreme Court · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Watkins v. FordUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Thatcher v. LangCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  3. Anderson v. BrinkerhoffCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  4. Commercial Investment Corp. v. SiggardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  5. Crescentwood Village, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API