Legal Opinion
Danielson v. Am. Fed'n of State
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided November 28, 2018No. CASE NO. 3:18-cv-05206-RJBPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT J. BRYAN, United States District Judge
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 28, AFL-CIO's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or Summary Judgment. Dkt. 41.
This case centers on the allegation that Plaintiffs, State of Washington employees who object to "forced" union membership, should not be required to pay compulsory agency1 fees in violation of the First *1084Amendment. See generally , Dkt. 1. It is alleged that the Union Defendants use agency fees to advance pro-union ideological or political purposes, to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wyatt v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Janus v. State, County, and Municipal EmployeesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mark Janus v. American Federation of StateCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Babb v. Cal. Teachers Ass'nDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Crockett v. Nea-AlaskaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2019
- Carey v. InsleeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- Lee v. Ohio Educ. Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.