Crockett v. Nea-Alaska
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. SEDWICK, SENIOR JUDGE
I. MOTIONS PRESENTED
At docket 49, Defendants NEA-Alaska, National Education Association, and Matanuska-Susitna Education Association ("Union Defendants") move to dismiss all of Plaintiffs' claims against them. They argue *1000that Plaintiffs' claim for prospective relief with respect to compulsory payments to unions must be dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. They argue that Plaintiffs' § 1983 claim and Alaska tort claims for retrospective monetary relief in relation to these compulsory payments must be dismissed under Rule…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Mark Janus v. American Federation of StateCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Dale Danielson v. Jay InsleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Babb v. Cal. Teachers Ass'nDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Stacey Mooney v. Illinois Education AssociatioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Lee v. Ohio Educ. Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.