Legal Opinion

Crockett v. Nea-Alaska

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided March 14, 2019No. 3:18-CV-00179 JWSPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN W. SEDWICK, SENIOR JUDGE

I. MOTIONS PRESENTED

At docket 49, Defendants NEA-Alaska, National Education Association, and Matanuska-Susitna Education Association ("Union Defendants") move to dismiss all of Plaintiffs' claims against them. They argue *1000that Plaintiffs' claim for prospective relief with respect to compulsory payments to unions must be dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. They argue that Plaintiffs' § 1983 claim and Alaska tort claims for retrospective monetary relief in relation to these compulsory payments must be dismissed under Rule…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Mark Janus v. American Federation of StateCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Dale Danielson v. Jay InsleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Babb v. Cal. Teachers Ass'nDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
  4. Stacey Mooney v. Illinois Education AssociatioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  5. Lee v. Ohio Educ. Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API