Legal Opinion

Hillman v. Garcia-Ruby

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1955No. S. F. 19238Published

1Opinion of the Court

44 Cal.2d 625 (1955)

SADIE HILLMAN, Appellant,

v.

RUDOLPH GARCIA-RUBY et al., Respondents.

S. F. No. 19238.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

May 27, 1955.

James C. Purcell and Michael Riordan for Appellant.

Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon and John F. Ward for Respondents.

TRAYNOR, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in an action for personal injuries. Plaintiff's complaint alleged, and evidence was introduced to support the allegations, that as she was walking along a public sidewalk defendants' police dog jumped upon and knocked her down causing severe injuries, that the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Sills v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. McGowan v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Ritchey v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Clowdis v. Fresno Flume & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1897

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API