Legal Opinion
Kalinick v. Collins Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 20, 1932PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The plaintiff was employed by The Collins Company from May, 1915, until January, 1923, as a wet grinder, and thereafter did other work for the same employer until January 6th, 1931, when he became disabled as the result of pneumoconiosis contracted while employed as a wet grinder. On March 20th, 1931, the compensation commissioner awarded the plaintiff weekly compensation of one half of his average weekly wages during the twenty-six weeks next preceding January, 1923. On December 8th, 1931, the case of Rousu v. Collins Co., 114 Conn. 24, 157 Atl. 264, was decided, holding that the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fair v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Goldreyer v. CronanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- Hayden v. R. Wallace & Sons Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Potter v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Rousu v. Collins Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Marone v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Foley v. George A. Douglas & Bro., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Misinonile v. MisinonileSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Trigg v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
- Miller v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.