Goldreyer v. Cronan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in ISTew Haven County, Bishop, J., assigning error in granting an oral motion of the plaintiff to correct the judgment by adding interest thereto.
1Opinion of the CourtTorrance, C. J.
The complaint in this case alleged that the defendant owed the plaintiff divers sums of money, the amount of one of the items being $300. The trial court allowed this item and disallowed the others. The case was tried at the November term of the court in 1902, and decided at the January term, 1903, the precise date of judgment being the 26th day of February, 1903. On that day the judge filed in court a paper called “memoranda on which judgment is based,” which, after reciting the substance of the evidence in the case, stated that the court allowed the $300 dollar item and disallowed the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Tyler v. AspinwallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
- Maryland Steel Co. v. MarneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
- Sturdevant v. StantonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
- Foster v. RedfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1877
3Cited by35 opinions
- Bridgman v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Blake v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Ferguson v. SaboSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Morici v. JarvieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Bulkeley's AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.