Legal Opinion

King v. Pierce Assocsiates, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 9, 2009No. Case 1:07-cv-02302 (RJL)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Grady King (“King,” “a plaintiff’) brought this action pro se against his former employer, Pierce Associates, Inc., alleging discriminatory conduct in violation of an unspecified provision of the law. Before this Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the defendant’s motion.

BACKGROUND

King alleges that on February 9, 2005, he was “verbally abused, called negative racial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  3. Sandra G. Bundy v. Delbert Jackson, Director, D.C. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  4. Rattigan v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  5. Chappell-Johnson v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Winston v. CloughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. Teliska v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. Montgomery v. MayorkasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  4. Nagi v. FoxxDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  5. Teliska v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API