Legal Opinion

People v. Brittany L.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 10, 2002No. B154167PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, Acting P. J.

In this case we hold the trial court erred in failing to order victim restitution without regard to potential third party reimbursement, as well as in failing to consider the defendant’s evidence challenging the necessity and amount of the victims’ claimed repair costs. Accordingly, we vacate the restitution order and remand to the trial court with directions to determine the amount of economic loss suffered by the victims in this case.

Facts and Proceedings Below

Mr. Steven Pastore and his wife decided not to pass out candy to trick-or-treaters on Halloween night…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. People v. ThygesenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. MillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Luis M. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. Anthony M.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. People v. Saint-AmansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API