Legal Opinion

Fibro Trust, Inc. v. Brahman Financial, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1999No. 970422PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

¶ 1 Plaintiff Fibro Trust, Inc. (“Fibro”), brought breach of contract and conversion claims against defendants Brahman Financial, Inc. (“Brahman”), American Pacific Securities, Ltd. (“APS”), and Mark Eames. The trial court granted a directed verdict for defendants. Fibro argues on appeal that the trial court erred in concluding that the contract was illegal. We agree and reverse and remand.

¶2 Fibro owns millions of shares in a publicly held company, Leasing Technology, Inc. (“LTI”). Fibro orally agreed to authorize Tranco, a stock transfer company, to register but not…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Aaron v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People v. WhitlowIllinois Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bennett v. HuishCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  2. Trivectra v. UshijimaHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Bonnie & Hyde, Inc. v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  4. Heideman v. Washington CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  5. Jones v. Salt Lake City Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API