Heideman v. Washington City
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREENWOOD, Associate Presiding Judge:
T1 Kent A. Heideman, Kimball B. Gardner, and Birdview Manufacturing, Inc.(collectively, Plaintiffs) 1 appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant Washington City (the City), claiming the trial court erred in concluding that (1) Plaintiffs' notice of claim was defective because it failed to name all possible causes of action, (2) there were no genuine issues of material fact, (8) Plaintiffs did not have a protected property interest at stake, (4) the City had not converted Plaintiffs' property, (5) the City's conduct did…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kennedy v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Jacobs, Visconsi & Jacobs, Co. v. City of LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
- Hyde Park Co. v. Santa Fe City CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Doyle v. Lehi CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Marietta Bergdorf, Memb Ventures LLC v. Salmon Elec. Contractors Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- Brian High Development, LC v. Brian Head TownCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- Lopez v. Administrative Office of the CourtsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Petersen v. RIVERTON CITYDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.