Mays Plus, Inc. v. Ennis
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
CAROL M. HANSEN, Judge:
¶ 1 Petitioners, Mays Plus, Inc. and American Home Assurance Company (collectively Employer), seek review of a Workers’ Compensation Court (WCC) order which, inter alia, found Respondent, Anna Ennis (Claimant) was in need of continuing medical maintenance. We hold there was no error of law in a three-judge panel allowing relief requested in a supplemental appeal filed more than ten days after the trial court’s order. Because the order is supported by competent evidence, we sustain.
¶ 2 Employer admitted Claimant sustained a compensable injury and provided…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Durant v. CicioSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Fink v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
- Transwestern Oil Co. v. PartainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Independent Finance Institute v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Burns v. Yuba Heat Transfer Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- L.E. Jones Drilling Co. v. HodgeCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- RENFRO ELECTRIC v. SEXTONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- Maxwell v. Faith Transport, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- RENFRO ELECTRIC v. SEXTONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014