RENFRO ELECTRIC v. SEXTON
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
LARRY JOPLIN, Presiding Judge.
1 1 Petitioners Renfro Electric and National American Insurance Company (collectively, Employer) seek review of an order of a three-judge panel affirming the trial court's award of benefits to Respondent Scott Sexton (Claimant). In this review proceeding, Employer challenges the award as contrary to the express terms of 85 0.8. § 3121), and contrary to the clear weight of the evidence.
12 Claimant worked for Employer and served as a Field Superintendent or Lead Journeyman on a crew of other employees. On the date in question, the crew under Claimant's supervision…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williams Companies v. DunkelgodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Wick v. GunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Smouse v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Oklahoma Railway Co. v. CannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Gregory v. Oklahoma Operating Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- RENFRO ELECTRIC v. SEXTONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014