American Well & Prospecting Co. v. Blakemore
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Samuel H. French and Avery & French for Appellant Blakemore in L. A. No. 5132. Davis & Rush for Appellants Schneider and Fieber in L. A. No. 5132. Henry K. Norton, Rhodes & Howard and Wilbur Bassett for Respondent in L. A. No. 5132. Henry K. Norton, Rhodes & Howard and Wilbur Bassett for Appellant in L. A. No. 5133. Samuel H. French, Avery & French and Davis & Rush for Respondents in L. A. No. 5133.
1Opinion of the CourtLaw Lor, J.
Both the plaintiff, American Well and Prospecting Company, a corporation, and the defendants, C. P. Blakemore, William Schneider, and Jacob Fieber, appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the respective sums of $3,820.15 against the defendant Blakemore, $1,140 against defendant Schneider, and $1,140 against defendant Fieber, in two actions brought to recover from the defendants certain sums alleged to be due from each of them as the balance not paid in upon their stock in the defendant corporation, Rex Midway Oil Company.
There is no dispute as to the facts. The Oil Company was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Earle v. CarsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Vermont Marble Co. v. Declez Granite Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Allen v. Montgomery Rail RoadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
- McDonald v. DeweySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- San Bernardino Investment Co. v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McDaniel v. FRISCO EMPLOYES'HOSPITAL ASSOCIATIONMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Schlitz v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Conover v. HasselmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Brown v. St. Paul Consolidated Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Jent v. FriggeriSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.