Legal Opinion

Conover v. Hasselman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 10, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vermilion, J. —

The action is upon two promissory notes executed by the defendant, appellant, for stock in the Associated Packing Company and the Des Moines Union Stockyards Company. That the notes were- procured by fraud, and were without consideration, is practically conceded; and the court below so instructed the jury. The plaintiff, in reply to the defenses of fraud and want of consideration," alleged that he was a holder in due course of the notes. This was the only question submitted to the jury.

The appellee, as a witness, admitted that he knew, at the lime he purchased the notes, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Arnd v. AylesworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Connelly v. Greenfield Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. Haman v. PrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. McLaughlin-Gormley-King Co. v. HauserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Rice v. Peninsular ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. RoachWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State v. ProostSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  3. Gregory v. SuhrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  4. Olson v. ShaferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Sword v. SprySupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API