Conover v. Hasselman
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
Vermilion, J. —
The action is upon two promissory notes executed by the defendant, appellant, for stock in the Associated Packing Company and the Des Moines Union Stockyards Company. That the notes were- procured by fraud, and were without consideration, is practically conceded; and the court below so instructed the jury. The plaintiff, in reply to the defenses of fraud and want of consideration," alleged that he was a holder in due course of the notes. This was the only question submitted to the jury.
The appellee, as a witness, admitted that he knew, at the lime he purchased the notes, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arnd v. AylesworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Connelly v. Greenfield Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Haman v. PrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- McLaughlin-Gormley-King Co. v. HauserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Rice v. Peninsular ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Caldwell v. RoachWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. ProostSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- Gregory v. SuhrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- Olson v. ShaferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Sword v. SprySupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.