Legal Opinion

State v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2001No. 98C43653; A104550PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction, after a jury trial in Marion County Circuit Court, of two counts of aggravated theft and one count of criminal mischief. ORS 164.057; ORS 164.965. Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss count 2 of the indictment, which alleged the crime of aggravated theft in the first degree, on the ground that he had previously been prosecuted in Multno-mah County for the same offense and, accordingly, the Marion County prosecution is barred by double jeopardy under Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution. We affirm.

We state…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. BoydOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. HammangOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. FarleyOregon Supreme Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CoxOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. TosteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. State v. TosteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API