Legal Opinion

State v. Boyd

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1975PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C.J.

The Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of an indictment charging defendant with criminal activity in drugs (ORS 167.207) on the ground that prosecution was barred under our decision in State v. Brown, 262 Or 442, 497 P2d 1191 (1972) because of a prior prosecution of defendant for theft (OES 164.055). We allowed the petition for review in this case in order to attempt a clarification of the meaning of the phrase “same act or transaction” employed in State v. Brown, and the phrase “same criminal episode” found in OES 131.515 (2).

The facts of this case are undisputed. During January of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. FitzgeraldOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. State v. HuennekensOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Woodfin v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  3. Cousins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 1978

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API