Legal Opinion

State v. Toste

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 27, 2004No. 007169; A115472Published

1Opinion of the Court

100 P.3d 738 (2004)

196 Or. App. 11

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,

v.

Paul R. TOSTE, Appellant.

007169; A115472.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted July 9, 2003.

Decided October 27, 2004.

Kevin T. Lafky, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Elizabeth A. Baldwin, Van Nuys, CA, and Stephen L. Roman.

Kaye Ellen McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and BREWER, Judges.

LANDAU, P.J.

In this criminal…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API