State v. Farley
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.
In this case and in State v. Ellison, also decided today, the Court of Appeals rejected claims by defendants charged with driving when their licenses were suspended 1 that they were “put in jeopardy twice for the same offence,” contrary to Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution. We hold that the claim should have been sustained in one case and not in the other.
Donald Farley, the defendant in this case, was arrested for and charged with driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) 2 as well as driving “while suspended” (DWS). Misdemeanor charges originally were filed in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. HammangOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. KnowlesOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. FarleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. HathawayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. BannisterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. EllisonOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.