Legal Opinion
In Re Xerox Corp. Erisa Litigation
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 17, 2007No. Civ. 3:02CV01138(AWT)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT
THOMPSON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, who are participants in two Xerox Corporation 401(k) retirement income plans, contend that the defendants, who are Xerox Corporation (“Xerox” or the “Company”) and certain of its present and former directors, officers, and employees, breached fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”) in connection with investments in Xerox common stock. The Consolidated Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 39) sets forth five causes of action: Count I (Imprudent…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bettina Littell v. Houston Independent SchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- In Re Morgan Stanley Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Carney v. LopezDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Apace Communications, Ltd. v. BurkeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- Vellali v. Yale Univ.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.