Hanovia Chemical & Manufacturing Co. v. Keller
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
— On February 20, 1926, the plaintiff began this action to recover from the defendant the sum of $322.88, balance alleged to be due on certain promissory notes. On the thirtieth day of March, 1926, the defendant filed a demurrer, a demand for a change of place of trial, and an affidavit of merits. The demand, omitting the title, is in the following words: “I, the undersigned, defendant, in the above entitled Action, hereby demand that the place of trial of this cause be changed to the proper county, to-wit: the County of San Mateo, State of California. ’ ’ (Signed by defendant.)
The affidavit…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cook v. PendergastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Bohn v. BohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Bonestell, Richardson & Co. v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Pearkes v. FreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Lundy v. LettunichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hamilton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Hamilton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974