Bonestell, Richardson & Co. v. Curry
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing a change of the place of trial. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and George H. Sturtevant, Deputy Attorney-General, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco denying appellants’ motion for a change of place of trial of the above-entitled action from said superior court to the superior court of the county of Sacramento. The action was one instituted in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco against appellants, who were respectively secretary of state, assistant attorney-general, and state printer of the state of California, and the members of the partnership firm of A. Zellerbach & Sons, to which a contract for the furnishing of certain…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Elliot v. Cronk'sNew York Supreme Court · 1834
- Hopkins v. HaywoodNew York Supreme Court · 1835
3Cited by15 opinions
- Regents of University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Cecil v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Legarreta Ruiz v. Tesorero de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1939
- Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Stoneham v. RushenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.