Griffith Et Ux. v. Hamer
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Jambs, J.,
On June 29, 1931, Cevilla Griffith and John R. Griffith filed their petition for the appointment of viewers for damages to their property in the Borough of Fern-dale. Viewers were appointed, hearings held and a report was filed September 7, 1931, awarding damages in the sum of $425, on which date the report was confirmed nisi and confirmed absolutely on October 8, 1931. Notice of filing the report had been given to the borough. On May 14, 1932, judgment was entered on the award and on October 31, 1932, a petition was filed asking that an alternative writ of mandamus issue…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Augustine v. WolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Wright v. LinhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Lukac v. MorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Schlosberg v. City of New CastleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alberts v. Urban Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Bailey v. Brown, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1944