Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Brown

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided September 28, 1944No. 2198Published

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, P. J.,

This matter comes before the court on motions to open two judgment notes entered of record which defendant avers were forgeries. Depositions under oath have been taken by both parties. Defendant testified that she did not sign the said judgment notes. A witness whose name appears on the said notes has testified that she did not in fact witness the signature of defendant on the notes and that she never saw them before. It is the testimony of plaintiff that he prepared the two said judgment notes as evidence that there are due and owing him certain sums of money for services…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blauvelt v. KemonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  2. Williams v. NotopolosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. United States Savings and Trust Co. v. HelselSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Griffith Et Ux. v. HamerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API