Schlosberg v. City of New Castle
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Linn, J.,
This appeal is from an-order allowing mandamus-execution on the confirmed award of viewers in a change of grade proceeding. The only facts that we consider are those contained in the petition and in the answer filed pursuant to the rule to show cause. The petitioners owned land fronting on Williams Street in New Castle, a city of the third class. An ordinance authorized the grading of the street. The work was done. The city filed a petition for viewers who were appointed, performed their duties, filed a report in which, inter alia, they awarded to the present'petitioners…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Myers v. Borough of South BethlehemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Township of North Whitehall v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
- Opening of ParkwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- In re Sedgeley AvenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- Wilson v. Commissioners of Huntingdon CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. KrausSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Griffith Et Ux. v. HamerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Larsen v. LarsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Larsen v. LarsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Tamaqua School Dist., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.