Legal Opinion

Alberts v. Urban Redevelopment Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 17, 1971PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Manderino,

The Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh, exercising its right of eminent domain, filed a declaration of taking on the property of Fred and Dorothy Alberts on October 22, 1968. After the declaration was filed, viewers were appointed, a hearing conducted and an award made to the Alberts. The Authority appealed from the award and a trial followed on November 26, 1969, which ended in a consent verdict of $10,500 plus detention money to the date of the payment. Judgment was entered on the verdict but no appeal was taken from the judgment.

On the face of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Kensington & Oxford Turnpike Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  2. Com. ex rel. Harkins v. HinksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Griffith Et Ux. v. HamerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Arnold v. BlaST Intermediate Unit 17Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Adler v. Lincoln Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  3. Carroll Township Authority v. Municipal AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. In re: Condemnation of a Certain Parcel of LandCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Township of Ridley v. FordeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API