Legal Opinion
O'Brien v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 30, 1996No. 15151PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The sole issue in this appeal concerns the application of an insurance policy’s “other insur*838anee” clause to an insured pedestrian injured by an uninsured motor vehicle. The plaintiff, Kevin O’Brien, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his application to vacate an arbitration award in favor of his insurer, the defendant, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company. The trial court determined that, in addition to being covered under a personal automobile liability insurance policy issued to him by the defendant, the plaintiff was also covered as a resident relative under his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Ceci v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Pecker v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Board of Education v. State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Gottesman v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Hertz Corp. v. Federal InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Hansen v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Peerless Insurance v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.