Legal Opinion
Fontana v. Caldera
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 5, 2001No. CIV. A. 00-1732PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs John Fontana and Kevin Murphy filed motions for preliminary and permanent injunction, seeking to prevent enforcement of a decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (“ABCMR”), endorsing the Army’s calculation of their separation from service date. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. After filing stipulations, the Magistrate Judge treated the party’s filings as cross-motions for summary judgement, and found in favor of the plaintiffs. Before the court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Association of Civilian Technicians, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Levant v. RocheDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Coburn v. McHughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- In Re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act ListingDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Safari Club International v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.