Legal Opinion
In Re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 17, 2011No. Misc. No. 08-764 (EGS). MDL No. 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
818 F.Supp.2d 240 (2011)
In re POLAR BEAR ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT LISTING AND § 4(d) RULE LITIGATION.
This Document Relates To: Safari Club Int'l, et al. v. Salazar,[1] et al., No. 08-881; Hershey v. Salazar, et al., No. 09-324; Kreider v. Salazar, et al., No. 09-325; Atcheson, et al. v. Salazar, et al., No. 09-941.
Misc. No. 08-764 (EGS). MDL No. 1993.
United States District Court, District of Columbia.
October 17, 2011.
Douglas Scott Burdin, Lead Attorney, Anna Margo Seidman, Safari Club International, Washington, DC, for Safari Club International, Safari Club International Foundation, Plaintiffs.
B…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Conservation Force v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing & Section 4(D) Rule Litigation-MDL No. 1993 v. JewellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Georgia Aquarium, Inc. v. PritzkerDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
- Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing & Section 4(d) Rule Litigation v. JewellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013