Legal Opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. California Coastal Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 12, 1982No. Civ. 51055PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RATTIGAN, J.
Respondent and appellant Georgia-Pacific Corporation (Georgia-Pacific) operates a lumber processing facility on real property owned by it and located on the coastline at Fort Bragg in Mendocino County. The property is within the coastal zone established by the California Coastal Act of 1976 (hereinafter Coastal Act). (Pub. Resources Code, div. 20, commencing with § 30000.) Pursuant to the Coastal Act, Georgia-Pacific applied to the California Coastal Commission, North Coast Region (Regional Commission), for permits authorizing the construction of four proposed facilities on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- ASSOCIATED HOME BUILDERS ETC. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- United States v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Feduniak v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Whaler's Village Club v. Califonia Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.