Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Hart
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 12, 1944No. 6125PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Chief Justice.
This suit, brought by appellee against appellant, involves the construction of a mineral deed conveying a fractional interest in the minerals in and under a 10-acre tract of land in Rusk County. Omitting the field note description, the mineral deed reads:
“The State of Texas J Know All Men By “County of Rusk J These Presents:
“That I, W. J. Gamble, of Rusk County, Texas, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten & No/100 ($10.00) cash in hand paid by - W. A. Mulkey hereinafter called Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, have granted, sold, conveyed assigned…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. WeedTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Clemmens v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Gulf Coast Water Co. v. Hamman Exploration Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Cavazos v. TrevinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Murphy v. JamisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richardson v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Lanehart v. RabbNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
- Shinn v. BuxtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- Peacock v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952