Legal Opinion

Peacock v. Alexander

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 1952No. 6645, 6649Published

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice.

The trial court rendered summary judgment in' cause No. 6645, construing a certain mineral deed in favor of appellees Alexander and wife against appellant J. H. Peacock; and in cause No. 6649 the trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of appellee J. H. Peacock and against appellants P. H. Alexander and wife, holding the appellants’ cause of action barred by the fortr-year statute of limitation, R. S. Art. 5529, in so far as Alexanders’ cause of action sought cancellation of the royalty deed for (1) fraud and misrepresentation, (2) for failure of consideration and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. WeedTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Richardson v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Kokernot v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. State Nat'l Bk. of Corpus Christi v. MorganTexas Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API