Legal Opinion

Biberstine v. Woodworth

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1978No. Docket 31073PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves a claim of attorney malpractice. The circuit court granted accelerated judgment, GCR 1963, 116.1(5), after it found that the applicable statute of limitations had run. Plaintiff appeals, we reverse.

*707Plaintiff retained defendant to file a personal bankruptcy in 1970. The original petition was filed in the bankruptcy court on March 17, 1971, and amended on April 19, 1971. Neither petition scheduled a debt owed by plaintiff to the Michigan Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund. Plaintiff attempted several times to have defendant schedule this debt, including filing a request for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dyke v. RichardMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Tumey v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Basic Food Industries, Inc. v. Travis, Warren, Nayer & BurgoyneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Berry v. ZismanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sam v. BalardoMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Biberstine v. WoodworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Biberstine v. WoodworthMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Sam v. BalardoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Sam v. BalardoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API