Legal Opinion

Biberstine v. Woodworth

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1978No. Docket 31073Published

1Opinion of the Court

81 Mich. App. 705 (1978)

265 N.W.2d 797

BIBERSTINE

v.

WOODWORTH

Docket No. 31073.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided March 7, 1978.

Keller & Katkowsky, P.C., for plaintiff.

Woodworth & Woodworth, for defendant.

Before: T.M. BURNS, P.J., and R.B. BURNS and W.R. BROWN,[*] JJ.

2Per curiam

This case involves a claim of attorney malpractice. The circuit court granted accelerated judgment, GCR 1963, 116.1(5), after it found that the applicable statute of limitations had run. Plaintiff appeals, we reverse.

Plaintiff retained defendant to file a personal bankruptcy in 1970. The original petition was filed in the bankruptcy…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dyke v. RichardMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Tumey v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Basic Food Industries, Inc. v. Travis, Warren, Nayer & BurgoyneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Berry v. ZismanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Biberstine v. WoodworthMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API