Legal Opinion

Tumey v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1947No. Docket No. 38, Calendar No. 43,259PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, C. J.

Plaintiff Harry A. Tumey was employed by the city of Detroit, department of street railways, during the period from January 1, 1932 to October 1, 1933. Claiming that deductions during said period were made from his salary under an arrangement whereby he was entitled to recover the amount thereof, he brought suit in the circuit court of Wayne county. The declaration álleged that defendant withheld from plaintiff’s salary five per cent, during the months of January and February, 1932,10 per cent, thereafter until August 1, 1932, 55 per cent, during August, 10 per cent, from September 1, 1932,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Van Buskirk v. KuhnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Anderson v. KearlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. McConnell v. ElliottMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Lane v. B & J Theatres, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Werker v. McGrainMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dxs, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, F/k/a Flint X-Ray, Inc. v. Siemens Medical Systems, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Banish v. City of HamtramckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Kincaid v. CardwellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Irving M. Waltzer v. Transidyne General CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. Warren Consolidated Schools v. W. R. Grace & Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API