Legal Opinion
Embrico v. United States Steel Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 30, 2005No. Civ.A. 03-CV-5571PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Nick Embrico, Richard E. Thomas, Frank Vitucci, and Roy Williams are all former non-union managerial em ployees of the Fairless Works plant owned by the defendant United States Steel Corporation (“U.S.Steel”). They all retired under the defendant’s “Voluntary Early Retirement Program” (“VERP”) in the fall of 2001. The plaintiffs bring this action alleging that the manner in which the defendant implemented its VERP violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. (2005), the Pennsylvania…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pippin v. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Boandl v. GeithnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Healthcare Advocates, Inc. v. Harding, Earley, Follmer & FraileyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Embrico v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- BARTELL v. COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.