Legal Opinion

Oakley v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided August 22, 1967No. Civ. A. Nos. 5779, 5888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WALTER E. HOFFMAN, Chief Judge.

A controversy having arisen as to the taxation of costs in these cases, and counsel having submitted the facts by agreement, the following is for the guidance of counsel.

No. 5779 (Oakley) was tried on damages only on March 23, 1967. The defendant had admitted liability on March 9-10, 1967. Prior to the admission of liability by defendant, counsel for plaintiff had caused certain subpoenas to be issued for witnesses deemed necessary to prove liability. On or about March 17, counsel for plaintiff wrote letters to the liability witnesses notifying them…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Katz v. Cie Generale TransatlantiqueDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Printree, Ltd. v. Tribute Knits, Inc. (In Re Printree, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  2. United States v. Article of DrugDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1976
  3. United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API